Article #
Posted Wednesday 22nd August 2007 10:21 GMT
I'm quite glad the article mentioned it was a pornographic website.
...i nearly went to try and get a bargain.....
Honest!
Chris
Posted Wednesday 22nd August 2007 10:21 GMT
I'm quite glad the article mentioned it was a pornographic website.
...i nearly went to try and get a bargain.....
Honest!
Chris
Posted Wednesday 22nd August 2007 11:04 GMT
"American girls aged between 3 and 11 own an average of eight Barbie dolls each".
I bet they didn't say how many of those barbie dolls suffer loss of head or limbs by the brothers of said 3 - 11 year olds.
Posted Wednesday 22nd August 2007 12:00 GMT
This gives them the marketing oppotunity of a life time, they could produce asian-looking barbies which speak
"Me luv you long time!"
"sukky sukky, only five dollah!"
"Soul daddy too big!"
Any takers?!
Posted Wednesday 22nd August 2007 13:19 GMT
Chris, how many do you already own?
Posted Wednesday 22nd August 2007 13:30 GMT
One of our hosting customers asked me to change her domain name from one that referenced the word Barbie to a slightly different variation.
I asked her why and apparently they took her to some kind of tribunal and managed to get the domain transferred into their own names.
Posted Wednesday 22nd August 2007 15:59 GMT
Bah, the alleged pr0n site seems to be malfunctioning. It has a completely innocent front page with an "Enter" link, which points to a page the server doesn't find.
Does anybody have a working link to the site's real contents? Or is it really completely offline now?
Posted Wednesday 22nd August 2007 18:34 GMT
You've just got to love it when an American corporation can appropriate a common name (Barbie) and then prevent anyone else from ever using that name again. It's not like they created a new name for their doll, they used a name that was already in use. That would be like a corporation today making a "Jennifer" doll and then suing anyone who tried to use that name. It's ridiculous.