NASA nuke-bot to tackle space boulders of doom
Vladimir Plouzhnikov
Green priorities #
Posted Monday 6th August 2007 13:17 GMT
I wonder if the goal of saving the planet would justify the use of the un-green technology, such as big bad rockets and dirty radioactive nukes, in the eyes of the environmentalists or will they protest against that project too (as they protested against Cassini)?
Anonymous Coward
right.. #
Posted Monday 6th August 2007 13:19 GMT
Because we trust robots with massive nukes a lot more then we do humans..
I can just imagine the shocked look on the face of some NASA Mission director as the asteroid hurtles towards earth, closely followed by frantic robots crossing their fingers for human annihilation, while hurtling a barrage of missiles after it, just to add some insult to injury.
I do hope to see this article come up again tomorrow, but then under the correct 'Rise of the Machines' chapter.
Karl Lattimer
Oh Please god #
Posted Monday 6th August 2007 14:01 GMT
Let it be sky, remove that satellite and suddenly rupert murdoch's balls are cut off...
Oh please let it be sky!
Anonymous Coward
Thunderbirds are.....go? #
Posted Monday 6th August 2007 14:01 GMT
"Apparently, the three different plans are each optimised for different types of asteroid. Once the composition of a dangerous space object was known, the design of the interceptor would be selected."
Tony Fuller
Close Shave #
Posted Monday 6th August 2007 14:01 GMT
Surely a 270 Metre meteorite passing close enough to earth to take out a few communications satelites should be cause for concern? Has the possiblity of it hitting the moon or at least altering its orbit (and therefore on tides) been calculated?
I must admit the idea of pushing out of the way sounds preferable to the earth being showered with the radiactive remnants, don't you think?
Mike Richards
Awww... #
Posted Monday 6th August 2007 14:01 GMT
'Disappointingly for fans of Armageddon, the NASA asteroid-defence mission included no role for any eccentric oil-drilling experts, nor even any straight-arrow astronauts. '
But can we pack Bruce Willis and Ben Affleck off there anyway?
Campbell
Hit or miss #
Posted Monday 6th August 2007 14:13 GMT
mmm... first they say it's going to smash us and now the chance is extremely small.
Makes me wonder why the panic in the first place if the trajectories are so widely different and if THEY are telling us the full story?
Anyway's, fingers crossed it'll be Astra, or it's successor, that will be one of the satellites pulverised.
God knows it's passed time Sky had a regulator.
Craig Leeds
Very funny #
Posted Monday 6th August 2007 15:10 GMT
Err? So NASA with its flawless safety record want to put six 1.2 megaton B83 nuclear warheads on a rocket ship controlled by Robots?
This is a joke right?
James Bassett
Meaningless Rubbish #
Posted Monday 6th August 2007 15:10 GMT
This article is completely meaningless. 270 meters? What are these meters of which you speak? We need hard scientific facts. How big is this object in the International SI Units of Double Decker busses or Football Pitches?
Anonymous Coward
I'd rather take my chances #
Posted Monday 6th August 2007 15:18 GMT
A long time ago, I read somewhere that some boffins came up with the idea of constructing a land bridge between North America and Great Britain by reshaping the Earth using nuclear bombs. Thank God they weren't taken seriously. I sincerely hope someone double-checks the calculations before allowing several megatons of nuclear explosives to detonate in the close vicinity of Earth.
amanfromMars
Virgin Virtual Flight Air Arm. #
Posted Monday 6th August 2007 15:18 GMT
Is Virgin Galactic not a Personalised Space AddVenture with First Class Dream Servers/Flying dDutchman Eerste Klasse. AI Tailored Ride you can XPlore More with what you Discover in Space Training ... on Earth with Confined Space's XPerience?
IT is Particularly Passionate when you are Alone Together in an Alien Setting/Fantasy Scenario. :-)
Nev
Al Qaeda ! #
Posted Monday 6th August 2007 15:48 GMT
Has no one realised that this could present a greater threat?
What if Al Qaeda get there hands on some asteroid nudging technology and push it into the Earth? Arrrg! PANIC!!!!
JP
Hang on... #
Posted Monday 6th August 2007 15:48 GMT
So the asteroid is going to miss us this time around, and the next time around, and so on for the "foreseeable future". But, so as to save a few, well actually, ONE BSkyB satellites, we're going to use nukes to push it slightly off course this time around, and have no idea where it's coming back next time...
Great idea, folks! Glad you have the priorities right. I can just see in 2036, NASA turning around and delcaring "Folks. You know that slight "correction" we made last time? Can we do that, but like, 1,000 times more? It seems like it's coming straight for us this time..."
Or even better, they end up buring off the wrong side of teh asteriod and correct the flightpath INTO Earth... "Oops. That was a +90 degrees, not a -90 degrees..."
I'll hold off having children for a while...
Anonymous Coward
Title #
Posted Monday 6th August 2007 15:52 GMT
So NASA can't say for sure what it's mass (which is a bit strange given they know it's orbit) and they are not sure what it's made off.
If it turns out to be frozen beer can they send it this way. It'll be a hell of a hangover. :)
Dillon Pyron
Apophis #
Posted Monday 6th August 2007 15:58 GMT
Of course, as any fan of Stargate: SG1 knows, Apophis was a real threat to the Earth, but he's now dead. First he died on base and was shipped to Anubis, who used a sarcophagus to revive him. Then SG1 nuked the planet, which appeared to kill him for good. So Apophis is no longer a threat and NASA is wasting their time and my tax dollars.
Bill Fresher
2004 QA22 #
Posted Monday 6th August 2007 16:55 GMT
Apophis is supposed to come 0.09 Lunar distances from Earth. The Near Earth Object Program website says that on Aug 24 2130AD there's an object called "2004 QA22" that's supposed to come 0.0003 Lunar Distances from Earth. Shame I won't be around to see it.
Morely Dotes
@ Dillon Pyron #
Posted Monday 6th August 2007 16:55 GMT
Anonymous Coward
Rupert Murdoch's balls #
Posted Monday 6th August 2007 18:22 GMT
If he's got any balls by 2021-2036, they should be pretty shrivelled anyway... unless he's part of the Rise of the Machines and has been a robot all along... hmm, not impossible.
SpitefulGOD
eak. #
Posted Monday 6th August 2007 22:20 GMT
I figure that the man made virii that will be released in 2016 will pretty much knock most of mankind off the planet so is this gonna leave the survivers f00ked or are these robot warriors gonna be preprogrammed?
Andy Bright
Oops #
Posted Monday 6th August 2007 22:20 GMT
I've always wondered about the irony of testing said asteroid disrupters - that is if they accidentally sent what was previously a harmless chunk of rock hurtling into the planet..
Bryan Seigneur
Why worrying about robots controlling nukes? #
Posted Monday 6th August 2007 23:33 GMT
You ever heard of a nuke ICBM that is supposed to be controlled directly by hand? The machine overlords have had control of the nukes for 40 years. What makes you think they would choose to destroy us now?
Anonymous Coward
Hmmm - possible legal consequences??? #
Posted Tuesday 7th August 2007 00:03 GMT
There's one little problem with the asteroid 'nuking' schemes - something called the Limited Test Ban Treaty of 1963...
Salient part of the text:
Article I
1. Each of the Parties to this Treaty undertakes to prohibit, to prevent, and not to carry out any nuclear weapon test explosion, or any other nuclear explosion, at any place under its jurisdiction or control:
(a) in the atmosphere; beyond its limits, including outer space; or under water, including territorial waters or high seas; or...
Full text can be found at:
http://www.state.gov/t/ac/trt/4797.htm
Anonymous Coward
Just as long as.... #
Posted Tuesday 7th August 2007 06:20 GMT
....it comes AFTER i have retired to live the good life. Stuff you younger ones, you can wrangle your own asteroids and stuff.
Corrine
Close vicinity? #
Posted Tuesday 7th August 2007 06:23 GMT
Detonating a few megatons right outside the earths atmosphere is unlikely to do anything at all to the people on the surface*, given that we spend every day with something just as hot and radioactive shining down at us. (Though perhaps looking up at the explosion would be a bad idea.)
And this plan calls for the nukes to be detonated when the asteroid is still a year, or years, away, read, out by mars.** (The Martians may take exception to this of course, their atmosphere is a lot thinner than ours.)
It's a comforting thought that had Apophis been a real threat***, we would have been prepared.
*Except disrupt the communication satellites.
**Not really mars, but you get the idea.
***I have a sneaking suspicion that Apophis is a very very real threat, and that everybody is lying to us to avoid panic while NASA quietly goes about handling it. Mostly because I wouldn't tell people in that situation either. We are of course, all going to die as a result of this plan, because NASA is going to get its funding cut off at a critical moment by some idiot group of senators that don't know what's going on.
chew6acca
I hope the The Machines (tm) don't realize... #
Posted Tuesday 7th August 2007 09:41 GMT
Wouldn't be simpler to 'nudge' earth out of the way ?
Steve Roper
Cheating armageddon #
Posted Tuesday 7th August 2007 09:41 GMT
Damn... so those pesky humans have finally developed the technology to deflect incoming asteroids! There goes my dream of seeing humanity smashed by a multi-million tonne chunk of orbiting rock... Oh well, I still have my dream of seeing humanity destroyed by a nice chunky black hole or neutron star passing through the solar system and ripping the Earth out of orbit...
Naaah. More likely the humans will destroy themselves before the Universe does. Forward the Lizard Alliance!
Anonymous Coward
Don't worry! #
Posted Tuesday 7th August 2007 09:41 GMT
The Transformers will save us!
Ross Fleming
Ingrates! #
Posted Tuesday 7th August 2007 09:44 GMT
Sheesh! The good ol' US/NASA offers to be our saviour from being hit by an asteroid and all we can do is moan about how they'll get it wrong. I think we should be eternally grateful for them saving our hides, and offer to help foot the trillion dollar bill.
I reckon they should practice by deflecting the moon first. Or better yet, a sky satellite.
<removing tongue from cheek now>
DrunkenMessiah
Please please please #
Posted Tuesday 7th August 2007 12:08 GMT
Someone from El Reg delete amanfromMars' account. Everytime I read a comment list he's (or should I say it's) there talking complete balls.