"Dorm room chit-chat does not make a contract." #
Posted Thursday 26th July 2007 05:12 GMT
"Dorm room chit-chat does not make a contract."
just enjoying this... :)
Posted Thursday 26th July 2007 05:12 GMT
"Dorm room chit-chat does not make a contract."
just enjoying this... :)
Posted Thursday 26th July 2007 11:33 GMT
Reminiscent of one of the Judges on Boston legal, with too much Jibber-Jabber
Posted Thursday 26th July 2007 11:33 GMT
They had a vebal contract, which holds as much legal water as a seive, to create this networking site. 3 of thm make ConnectU, and the other one makes Facebook. They have no paperwork, and no physical evidence to speak of (maybe code or something), and nothing to say "this is mine, he stole it".
Does the defendant even need to bother showing up for this?
Posted Thursday 26th July 2007 11:33 GMT
LOL..
"But she promised she'd do it...."
Posted Thursday 26th July 2007 11:38 GMT
what is their magical idea?
wow - a social networking site - with messages etc... thats so novel!
surely any number of sites do this well before they even got into harvard!
and what was their business plan?
i) get people to join
ii) make dosh from adverts
erm..... as before not exactly unique is it?
Posted Thursday 26th July 2007 11:38 GMT
Indeed, and fortunately so for any fresher who has ever said "You know I love you" or "Of course I'll respect you in the morning".
Posted Thursday 26th July 2007 14:57 GMT
It looks to me like UConnect are just publicly illustrating their talent for making crap decisions ... ;-)
Posted Thursday 26th July 2007 16:15 GMT
... aren't worth the paper they're written on.
I've heard similar comments from a judge before. They are so screwed.
"Does the defendant even need to bother showing up for this?"
Yep, but just barely. I wouldn't wear shorts and flip-flops.
Posted Tuesday 31st July 2007 11:24 GMT
Anywhere else on the planet, I'd have said it was a safe bet... But I wouldn't be surprised if the guy get's stiffed and has to shut the site down..