Badgeware? #
Posted Wednesday 25th July 2007 22:04 GMT
" ... enterprise Wiki maker Socialtext ... "
Sounds pretty Web 2.0 to me. Surely you mean 'badgerware'?
Posted Wednesday 25th July 2007 22:04 GMT
" ... enterprise Wiki maker Socialtext ... "
Sounds pretty Web 2.0 to me. Surely you mean 'badgerware'?
Posted Wednesday 25th July 2007 23:52 GMT
Displaying a logo once, on a splash screen, is different from the sort of badgeware liscence which has "traditionally" been objected to, which has required it on every UI page...
Posted Thursday 26th July 2007 05:26 GMT
Badger Badger Badger Badger
Badger Badger Badger Badger
MUSHROOOM!! MUSHROOOM!!!
Would that make OSI the snake? ;)
Posted Thursday 26th July 2007 05:26 GMT
I'm not sure I agree with the OSI's move here, they've created a rather neat hole for the old BSD style license to get OSI approval; even when such licenses are a known mistake because the cost too much in the end.
I'd rather see these CRM sites use aGPL http://www.gnu.org/press/2002-03-19-Affero.html all other open source web services and technical infrastructure should be too. because otherwise they are right, the site runners have no obligation to release patches or other improvements to the code.
Posted Thursday 26th July 2007 20:55 GMT
I think the only answer for this is for a new license that is ASL/BSD like, apart from when linked to badgeware where that badgeware software must also show my logo all over their pages.
Mark Proctor
JBoss Drools Lead
http://blog.athico.com
Posted Thursday 26th July 2007 23:03 GMT
PJ's Groklaw article sheds more light on this, its not quite the victory badgeware people claimed. Its far more watered down than what these people where trying to push.
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070726075823167
Mark