The Committee of Oversight and Government Reform has released its initial findings after investigating the use of parallel email accounts by officials in Bush's White House. According to the Presidential Records Act, White House officials are obliged to keep and preserve all communications which they send on official government …
The Democrats really can't try to win w/o tricks,uh?
The Democrats and their '68 neo-communist minded behaviour and ideas can't allow others to have privacy, all the privacy stuff belongs to the Democrats, "Heil Democrats!" we should start shouting since their political party with either the Clinton stuff or the Obama thing want to get power at any cost and breaking any rules.
This "all you emails belong to us" campaign is disgusting to say the least.
Shame on you Democratic party and Left Wing fanatics !
How... How...? HOW has this been turned around to make the DEMS look bad?!?
Which sick and fantastical world is the first poster living in that this is a story to make the Dems look like the evil ones? Emails relating to AT LEAST 5 ONGOING Republican investigations have been destroyed, which surely comes under comtempt of court if not obstruction of justice. The same names (the very top names) are getting repeated again and again and again (Libby, Rove, Rove, Cheney, Rove, Gonzales, Rove, Gonzales, Cheney, Rove, Rove...).
Stop taking the recreational kool-aid, and get back on your medication.
The first poster obviously did not read the arcticle very thoroughly
"According to the Presidential Records Act, White House officials are obliged to keep and preserve all communications which they send on official government business"
Its called the law!
Its there to protect you and others from the people who wield power and abuse it.
Wanted ...... a SMARTer President
Some of talk as if we're planning on making a Mars landing and use all the Communications Schannels and the President doesn't even use e-mail.
George, you wanna get out more, son. They're playing you for a dumb-hick cowboy and boy, are you its Lone Star.
Pot->Kettle = black
It's refreshing to see the Right suddenly get concerned about privacy.
NOW do you understand what it's all about?
'68 neo-communist behaviour? Wire-tapping republicans defenders of privacy? Are you drunk or something?
Re: The democrats really can't.....
I love your reasoning.
The White House and their staff should be allowed to conduct all of their illegal government business without any record!
That way the illegal business would never have existed, now would it......
Hear no Evil, See no Evil......
Ever noticed how when Republicans are caught in a scandal they *never* address the actual issue at hand? They *always* try to divert attention to how the information came to light or how the investigation was conducted or who the accuser is or... anything but the actual issue. Perfect example: the first comment on today's thread. Ironically, the poster is accusing the Democrats of "breaking the rules" for exposing Republicans breaking the law!
Shame on you Republicans for your actions, shame on you for the tactics you use to try to avoid the consequences of your actions, and shame on you all those who would defend either.
Who tricks the trickster?
Pretty narrow view there, mister Neo-Con. They broke the rules. They got caught. Now their wristies get slapped. Politics is a dirty game and the GOP are some of the dirtiest players out there. Don't look if you can't stand watching your team get hurt back sometimes.
This isn't about politics...
it's just a question of national security. By using a 3rd party system for mail traffic that could be potentially classified as a secret, they are commiting treason. This case should be assigned to the nsa and not to some commitee. Btw, if the nsa would be as brave as its european counterparts, they would have a copy of all emails and text messages sent by everyone within the usa.
Happens in the UK as well...
I know of some government e-mail accounts that are with yahoo, gmail, etc so staff can communicate without being subject to FoI.
Dude, are you insane???
troll-breath wrote above:
"The Democrats and their '68 neo-communist minded behaviour and ideas can't allow others to have privacy, all the privacy stuff belongs to the Democrats, "Heil Democrats!" we should start shouting since their political party with either the Clinton stuff or the Obama thing want to get power at any cost and breaking any rules."
Breaking rules...power at all costs...hm, sounds familiar. Don't know where've I've seen that before, maybe spying on our own citizens? Launching wars of conquest in violation of international law? Imprisoning suspects without the right to trial? Kidnapping foreign nationals/US citizens and holding them incommunicado in secret prisons?
And if these emails are exposed, probably rigging elections too?
Bush and the rest should be charged with war crimes, found guilty and hanged.
"This "all you emails belong to us" campaign is disgusting to say the least.
Shame on you Democratic party and Left Wing fanatics !"
And Hitler called Stalin a dictator...
Re: The Democrats really can't try to win w/o tricks,uh?
Neither can the Republicans, evidently.
'dirty tricks' ?
The person above needs to switch off Fox News once in a while.
Governments work for the people, not the other way round. They must be held accountable for everything they do. When you're responsible for making decisions that affect millions - if not billions - of people, your privacy is not of any concern. If you want to send private emails go home and do it. When I screw up at work they can look at my emails and use them as evidence against me, and I'm not even doing something that's going to have an affect on people's lives, why should these people get away with it? Official communications should be monitored and the government should have to answer for everything it does.
Many of America's problems stem from the fact that its citizens are unwilling or unable to question and criticise those in charge, defending every single thing one side or the other does because they're labelled 'conservative' or 'liberal'. Try practising some objectivity for a change.
The government is not your friend, it doesn't give two hoots about you. They should be scared of us, not the other way round.
Come now didn't the Republicans try and have Clinton impeached for a BJ? Where's his privacy? Of course that was a criminal act but only because the femme in question was not hot. I mean come on he's the president! When he scores we all do so it should be something more than what I can bring home on a Friday night,
What we are talking about here is not one or other political party, it's all about accountability of elected officials.
When it comes down to it people with that much power and responsibility need to be accountable to their electorate. Hiding their actions behind closed doors, or in this case deleted emails and secondary accounts, has airs of the sort of totalitarian regimes that Bush calls the "axis of evil" -- operating in the dark and shadows.
In any free society politicians are elected by the people, employed by the people and must be accountable to the people, if they aren't then we have no way of being sure that they aren't working against the interests of the electorate or are simply corrupt.
Why should public officials performing government business expect any amount of privacy?
Re: The Democrats really can't try to win w/o tricks,uh?
Must be a candidate for FOTW
Oh look, it's anonymous.
Related to the Voter Caging emails
Recall the voter caging of 2004, and the emails that were sent to *@georgewbush.org by mistake. Most are dull, but there's one or two, like the Voter Caging lists. (Send letters to black soldiers serving overseas, when the letter returns, use it to challenged the right to vote).
From: Tim Griffin - Research/Communications [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 5:55 PM
To: Kelly Porter [mailto:email@example.com]; Lindy Landreaux - Political [mailto:LLandreaux@rnchq.org]; Miriam Moore - Research/Communications [mailto:MMoore@rnchq.org]; Victoria Newton - Research/Communications [mailto:VNewton@rnchq.org]; Shawn Reinschmiedt - Research/Communications [mailto:SReinschmiedt@rnchq.org]; firstname.lastname@example.org; Stephen Shiver [mailto:email@example.com]; firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: RE: caging
thank you, perfect
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kelly Porter [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 5:47 PM
> To: Lindy Landreaux - Political; Miriam Moore - Research/Communications; Victoria Newton - Research/Communications; Tim Griffin - Research/Communications; Shawn Reinschmiedt - Research/Communications; firstname.lastname@example.org; Stephen Shiver; email@example.com
> Subject: caging
> The total to date is 1771.
> ATTACHMENT: Caging.xls
Some matches between the two email lists, e.g. Matt Schlapp seems to have an firstname.lastname@example.org address too. Trey Best is on both.
Interestingly email@example.com seems to be Brett Doster
The Florida CFO at the time, seems to have had a georgebush.com email address.
... what are you on about?
Just calm down for a minute, take a few deep breaths call for your physician.
This is one of the funniest comments I've seen in a long time. Clearly typed while shouting and shaking fists at the screen. surely flame of the week material.
Re: The Democrats really can't try to win w/o tricks,uh?
No, really - you're retarded right?! You could not seriously have posted that comment and meant it! You must be ... I know, you're secretly a Democrat, and you're acting SOOOO stupid so that people will THINK you're a Republican and thus associate Republicans with "stoo-pid" hence bringing about the eventual downfall of the current regime! That's what it is, isn't it? Either that, or you completely failed to read the second paragraph, which states that 88 Bush officials IGNORED THE LAW (emphasis mine, for your benefit). Yeah, it's disgusting what the Democrats are doing, enforcing law-abiding behaviour on criminals. Heil yourself, you jackass.
Apparently these Republicans do more campaigning than official business
You would think that for paid government positions, these people should spend their work days doing the people's business, not being constantly at work on campaigning for the Republican party. Typically one's default email account is the one used most, so the fact that so many people used their RNC acounts as default implies either that a whole lot of RNC work was being done on the public dole, or these people had reasons to to to conceal their work products from the people who employ them, the public.
Who Votes the First Post was a "Seed"?
No one, even the most beer-swilling, NASCAR-watchin', Country Music-listenin', trailer-park-livin', gun-totin', GOP-votin' redneck could be THAT dumb. Especially on this site.
However, it seems to have kicked off a pretty good line of comments.
I suspect that many of these stories come "seeded" with posts; designed to start a thread of controversy.
Politicians should have every activity monitored - from every bank account they control or own (yes, *every* bank account) to phone, fax, e-mail or any other online activity. They should be watched, like hawks - and the information made available for public scrutiny every week.
White House Big Brother, if you like.
When we see totally open, accountable and responsible politics, we will see good decisions being taken that are made for the right reasons, not because someone lobbied someone else in power and bribed them with lots of money. Politicians should not have privacy - we should be watching them like hawks.
For the privacy adocates, I'm all for privacy for citizens - because citizenship often can't be helped. You're born into a country and a citizenship, and you should have certain rights to go with that.
But to go into a politics is a choice - and unlike one's citizenship, a career can be changed quite easily because it's entirely your choice. If politicians knew what they were in for, if they were elected, many of the sleazier people might actually have second thoughts about the prospect of being caught with their pants down - and keep out. If any politician objects to the rules and says "But what about my privacy?" - the answer should be "You decided to run for office, and you knew what the sacrifices would be. You forfeit any rights to privacy until you're no longer in office."
I'm all for giving politicians (whatever their party) a harder time. For all the trouble they've bestowed on our shoulders, I think I'm actually being quite generous. After all, it's often said that politicians are like diapers / nappies: They need to be changed often, and for the same reasons.
copies of mails ?
"Karl Rove's PA, Susan Ralston, sent an email to Abramoff's associate Todd Boulanger, which said: "I now have an RNC BlackBerry which you can use to email me at any time. No security issues like my WH email.""
Yeah, no security at all, thus no issues I suppose ...
"The next step in the investigation is to discover whether other copies of these missing mails exist. The committee has written to 25 government agencies to see if they have copies, and initial responses are encouraging."
I really hope the NSA _is_ able to find some bits of it ! With all of the keywords contained in the mails ("Cheyney", "real president", "business", "Alliburton", "my a** full of money" ), and all of the public channels they travelled trough (most of them being warrantlessly wiretapped), it would be embarassing otherwise ...
Just block them
I can't get to any of the webmail services from my current client. I can't even get to my own. It's just a matter of blocking them.
But you don't think politicians of all stripes don't do the same thing? It's endemic in our government. It's a great way to leak information, to hide communication, to set up "plausible deniability". I'm sure some staffer on the committee has an anonymous email account.
Somehow this reminds me of...
Subject: USSR on Usenet
Before you accuse the democrats of neo-nazi behavior, why don't you look up your hero, George Bush's past. Here's a hint Conrad Bush, his grandfather financed Hitler to gain power in Germany
Re: Who Votes the First Post was a "Seed"?
I'm pretty much a riddle junkie so I have to bite on your question. Overall the post has to do with the upcoming Presidential election and little to do with the article. My guess is it's an overheated, armchair, political strategist already too far gone this early in the campaign. ...although it could be a "seed" worded to troll the article capitalizing on the Presidential Election. (which reminds me I have to replace the tinfoil lining in my hats.)
Prescott Bush, not Conrad. And a bit-part player at most -
""Come now didn't the Republicans try and have Clinton impeached for a BJ? Where's his privacy? Of course that was a criminal act but only because the femme in question was not hot. I mean come on he's the president! When he scores we all do so it should be something more than what I can bring home on a Friday night,""
he was impeached for lying under oath. A white house intern claimed she was fired after she refused an advance from pres. clinton. he said under oath that he never had made any advances at anyone. then monica was uncovered. then we all go obssessed with what the definition of "is" is, and foregot this started out as a sexual harrassment complaint.
@ Anonymous coward
"Shame on you Democratic party and Left Wing fanatics"
Excuse me? Was it the Democratic Party who sent burglars to break into the Watergate Hotel? Was it the Democrats who mismanaged the US economy so badly that they had to start not one but TWO foreign wars to distract the voters from the issues at home? Was it the Democrats who managed to "lose" eight ballot boxes in the swing State, Florida, during the crucial vote-counting, but later "found" them when their candidate was running neck-and-neck with the opposition? Was it the Democrats who had a Florida Secretary of State, legally required to determine if the election was valid, who was also the campaign manager for one of the candidates? Was it the Democrats who ignored the clear letter of the law and issued orders for warrantless wiretaps to be carried out against US citizens?
As it happens, I'm not a Democrat, either. But I can see who the obvious criminals are - and they aren't Democrats.
The best bit about that article
was the link to the video of George 'Mugya Bush' forgetting the name of Google Earth aka The Google Earth, If Google ever become supreme overlords of Earth they could change the planets name to that.
RE : Who Votes the First Post was a "Seed"?
"No one, even the most beer-swilling, NASCAR-watchin', Country Music-listenin', trailer-park-livin', gun-totin', GOP-votin' redneck could be THAT dumb."
Sadly, this is not true. Remember that upwards of 50% of Americans believe the earth was created in 7 days, 10k years ago, by a (suspiciously white) bloke with a beard who apparantly lives in the sky (although he's invisible, obviously)
Millions of them have drunk the Fox News Kool-aid, and now use the term 'liberal' as though it were synonomous with 'traitor' or perhaps 'paedophile'.
Sadly for the diminishing remainder of US citezens able to utilise their rational thought processes and string a sentence together without frothing at the mouth, these folks have ensured that in the rest of the world, the word 'American' is now more than ever synonomous with the local word for 'Retard'
No apologies to El Reg's American fan base, you all know it's true. Bitterly, unutterably sad, but true.
all that may be true, and the dems are pretty popular. guess thats why all those dead ppl vote for them 2 or 3 times in every election.
To the partisans
Democrat and Republican are all labels. They're all bastards to the core, the difference is in how they go about it.
Lets not forget that it's the democrats who faught tooth and nail to prevent a recent bill forcing ear-marks on bills to be made visible at a much ealier stage in the legislative process. These people claimed they were all for transparency in government, yet when they were held to this principle (hypocritically, one should add, by the republican rump who also liked earmarks when they were in the majority) they started to uhm and ah and make excuses.
They're all bastards.
Our lot are bastards too. Blair doesn't use e-mail. Half his cabinet probably don't know what a computer is. Bastards and idiots get in the politics because they can't function in the real world.
"The committee also dismissed the claim that officials acted out of ignorance. White House Counsel issued "clear written policies" in February 2001 that White House staff should only use the official White House email system for official communications."
I would have thought that meant "should only use" it for Official stuff like don't clutter it up with crap about everything if it's not that important use hotmail or something.
Otherwise "should use only" the Whitehouse system no matter what, if it's official then use the Whitehouse system because of the law.
"people to keep and bear Arms" just says keep and bear them not doing both "people keep to and bear Arms" means like keep arms and keep baring them
Trolling for News
Personally I think the first commenter was simply a Troll.. deliberately posting comments he/she knew would set people off..
Only Fox News "reporters" are retarded enough to say those sorts of things.. usually on demand after receiving a quick call from the White House..
As for the misdirection that Republicans get up to.. every politician does this, politicians that actually answer a question directly don't last very long.
It's just the Republican Party has a particularly cohesive strategy when it comes to the illegal activities of their members.
1/Get Fox News to start the misdirection by issuing comments about how this investigation is just about Democrats "Politicizing the issue".. and perhaps a quick "Dems used questionable sources/tactics to dig up this story".
2/Get as many people on as many news networks repeating the mantra - "Politicizing the Issue".. so that our support base isn't disillusioned by our illegal behaviour, falling for the "Amazing.. a politician is being political" line.. (I always find it amusing that President always whines about people using politics to derail his political actions; perhaps he should of considered a different line of work if he doesn't like politics or political behaviour).
3/Get as many representatives as possible to make statements in Congress about the "Dems using questionable sources/tactics to dig up this story" and maybe a quick "Politicizing the Issue" statement wouldn't go amiss.
By the time they've finished, most of the tabloid news channels (CNN, MSNBC, Fox, etc) have forgotten what the real story is and happily finish the job for them. So instead of treating these tactics with the contempt they deserve, they actually accept these statements as serious answers to questions about the illegal behaviour of Republicans.
Dem vs Repuplican ?!?
same old game .. get a clue .. they are ALL bought and sold or are 'familia'
I think the first post missed a very big part of their American Government class. Anyone ever read the Declaration of Independence or the US Constitution.
"That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
quoted directly from the D. of I. The government answers to and should be afraid of it's people. The people should not be afraid of their own government. I'm sure I'll be attacked left and right for this, but personally, I think the US is in need of a restoration of the original purposes of the government. If this means tearing it down forcefully and starting from scratch with the D. of I. and the Constitution. then so be it.
-Sincerely, a Disgusted middle American that has given up party politics and vote for the guy he feels less likely to screw up the country anymore.
Rep vs Dems & Privacy
From my POV: All citizens including those elected deserve privacy, especially from nosey busy bodies of the Press. While some organizations, my employer among them, think that they have the right to read any email passing through their computers, I feel that like mail delivered by the USPS, what is addressed to me, especially when it does NOT pertain to my job, is none of their business. Thus, I currently have 7 email addresses used for different purposes. As the official White House email is for “official business only” I would expect that the people there also have multiple accounts to deal with contacting friends, family, gathering news, carrying on other business, and yes, even supporting the Republican Party.
The article is slanted such that the act of having multiple email accounts is suspect as a means of avoiding the archiving of official business. This is obviously a political ploy, as I would be willing to bet that everyone on Capitol Hill has multiple email accounts, if they are computer savvy enough to have email.
As far as the Republican/Democrat controversy is concerned, there are criminals in both camps, stupid people in both camps, brilliant people in both camps, etc. Bill Clinton was impeached, justifiably, for lying under oath. I’m sorry that there was no punishment, but I’m very happy he was not removed fro office. Some of the members of Congress in both parties have also been found guilt of crimes, as well as some of the current administration. While some of the more rabid Bush haters think that everyone in his administration should be impeached, I’ve noticed that the Democratic leadership has NOT attempted to bring any sort of charges against either Bush or Cheney.
While I have not agreed with a number of this administration’s policies, neither have I thought that they were the worst possible choices. In most cases I would consider them merely mediocre. Nor do I believe –apparently as do some- that Bush is the Devil, his associates are Demons, and Civilization is about to fall! I would suggest reading more, listening more, and actually thinking actions, causes, effects, and future consequences, before forming an opinion.
^ anon - awful troll, but so many people fed it O.O
Re: Rep vs Dems & Privacy
I know the thread is dead, but I just couldn't resist:
[quote]I would suggest reading more, listening more, and actually thinking actions, causes, effects, and future consequences, before forming an opinion.[/quote]
Isn't it a riot that, after spending SERIOUS political capital trying to abrogate the right to privacy (See: NSA Wiretaps, PATRIOT Act, PATRIOT II Act, etc.), the Reps are suddenly worried about a right to privacy?
That line I quoted is the funniest one of the lot. THE ENTIRE REPUBLICAN STRATEGY has been based on a naked and undisguised contempt for Reason and consideration of ramifications. This has made Fox News a major player, despite its undisguised role as a Republican Propaganda outlet. For crying out loud: THE CURRENT PRESS SECRETARY IS A FOX NEWS ANCHOR.
The current administration has smeared disrespect over every facet of the US government. They have reduced the status of the United States to that of a large, semi-retarded bully, lurching around the world, doing nothing but damage. They have committed SERIOUS CRIMES that THEY HANGED PEOPLE FOR.
Let me make this clear: THE UNITED STATES HANGED DOZENS OF PEOPLE FOR LESSER CRIMES THAN THEY ARE OPENLY AND UNABASHEDLY COMMITTING EVERY DAY.
BTW: I'm not a liberal whacko. I've voted R a few times, but I don't think I ever will again. This administration has done several generations' worth of damage in an astonishingly short period of time.
Just get those emails from the NSA, you don't mean to suggest that government officials would not be wiretapped just like the rest of us, after all it's un-American to not be wire-tapped.
- 'Windows 9' LEAK: Microsoft's playing catchup with Linux
- Review A SCORCHIO fatboy SSD: Samsung SSD850 PRO 3D V-NAND
- Was Earth once covered in HELLFIRE? No – more like a wet Sunday night in Iceland
- Every billionaire needs a PANZER TANK, right? STOP THERE, Paul Allen
- Vid MIT boffins cry havoc and let slip the ROBOT CHEETAHS of Whoa