As this story seems to suggest otherwise...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/04/25/open_wi-fi_child_porn_case/

300 to 600 quid to settle. Hmm. In practical terms: is the recommended defence by Brooke North LLP going to be significantly cheaper to make it an attractive alternative to accepting Davenport's terms? And is Brooke North a firm whom has a reasonable history of success with defence in this particular area of the law? One wonders.

"The security of your computer and internet connection is your responsibility," it told them.

Doesn't that apply to Zuxxez too? After all, who let the software out in the first place ;-)