Monopoly Complaining? #
Posted Monday 16th April 2007 19:11 GMT
How does this Giant Monopoly called Microsoft think it has the right to complain about a merger of another company?
How many companies have they purchased or taken over?
Posted Monday 16th April 2007 19:11 GMT
How does this Giant Monopoly called Microsoft think it has the right to complain about a merger of another company?
How many companies have they purchased or taken over?
Posted Monday 16th April 2007 19:11 GMT
I laughed out loud when I saw the headline.
What barefaced audacity
Posted Monday 16th April 2007 19:11 GMT
Hmm, Microsoft complaining about other companies being anti-competitive. Now if that isn't the pot caling the kettle black I don't know what is.
Posted Monday 16th April 2007 19:11 GMT
"Microsoft is calling for regulator action to stop Google and DoubleClick merging, saying the deal would be anti-competitive if it went through."
You wouldn't believe how much this tickled my sense of schadenfreude ... maybe MS should get its own house in order before telling other people how to run theirs.
Does anyone know what Ballmer's reaction was? :-)
Posted Monday 16th April 2007 19:11 GMT
So Jilted Microsoft annoyed at being outbid decides to call the kettle black? Im sure little old Microsoft has never feared a bit of competition.
Posted Tuesday 17th April 2007 01:35 GMT
If I was slapped on the wrist for stealing milk then some of the other big boys did the same without getting the same reprimand then I'd be peeved off too.
Posted Tuesday 17th April 2007 01:35 GMT
Ballmer must be going nuclear at this, chair chucking, thats nothing! when the big guy goes green nothing can stop his furniture wrath...
Who the f**k uses windows live anyway? Google == Multivac ;) This level of hypocrisy is rarely found outside of religious institutions.
Posted Tuesday 17th April 2007 01:35 GMT
MS have enough experience of complainants winning anti-competitive lawsuits by now, they may as well give it a shot
Posted Tuesday 17th April 2007 09:14 GMT
Although I'm not defending Microsoft, I think gloating over this isn't very intelligent. It's clear to anyone that there are all the signs that Google will become another monopoly where if it turns out anything like Microsoft you'll find 96% of all advertising revenue going to Google and everyone else fighting for the crumbs. The implication that Google is some kind benevolent force is absolutely laughable, what do you think they are? Some kind of workers co-op? The anyone-but-Microsoft dialectic will just replace one tyranny with another.
Posted Tuesday 17th April 2007 15:18 GMT
... a little bit of wee came out :-)
Google/Doubleclick is surely an unholy alliance, and probably worthy of some regulatory attention, but to hear MS complain about anti competitive practice is just so damn surreal that I had to check that wasn't an April Fool that I had missed.