'The Newcastle embryos would have been 99.9 per cent human, and 0.1 per cent bovine.' #
Posted Thursday 5th April 2007 13:27 GMT
By a spooky coincidence, these are exactly the reverse of the proportions in the average New Labour backbencher
Posted Thursday 5th April 2007 13:27 GMT
By a spooky coincidence, these are exactly the reverse of the proportions in the average New Labour backbencher
Posted Thursday 5th April 2007 14:06 GMT
I think many will see this as the thin end of the wedge: setting a precedent. How big a percentage is necessary before diseases start jumping across the species ?
Posted Friday 6th April 2007 13:41 GMT
When are these "scientists" going to get over their egos and look at the facts? Other branches of stem cell research (i.e. cells from non-embryonic sources) are delivering impressive results thick and fast. Actually useful cures from embryonic stem cell research? None, that I know of. If they spent more time following the promising leads and less time destroying human life, everyone would benefit.