One of the exciting ideas just now is Microsoft's WPF, formally Avalon. Oversimplifying somewhat, this introduces a layered approach to UI design, separating the business logic from the UI design, so graphic artists can design the look-and-feel of your applications without worrying about the code implementing the business logic …
Well, Cathar me with a chainsaw...
..I mistakenly thought that was what I'd been doing in the IT field for the last 15-odd years - writing and designing separate business-logic, user-interface and data-interface layers.
Obviously, I wasn't. It didn't exist until Microsoft coined a TLA and started marketing it. Poor ol' delusional me.
I'm getting sick and tired of MS branding something and then releasing it as a "new concept".
Fair point, but
I did try to imply, by mentioning ILOG, that this wasn't an MS invention.
I too can remember separating business logic, data access and presentation layer (as I'd probably put it) in the 1980s.
But I don't remember having a graphics artist in the loop then and I'm not sure what s/he could have done if s/he had been....
I saw the ILOG reference... I wasn't in any way trying to imply that you meant this was a MS invention, only that, by re-naming it, *Microsoft* was trying to make us believe it was a new MS invention.
Sorry for the misunderstanding.
- +Analysis Microsoft: We're making ONE TRUE WINDOWS to rule us all
- Apple: We'll unleash OS X Yosemite beta on the MASSES on 24 July
- Pics It's Google HQ - the British one: Reg man snaps covert shots INSIDE London offices
- White? Male? You work in tech? Let us guess ... Twitter? We KNEW it!
- The END of the FONDLESLAB KINGS? Apple and Samsung have reason to FEAR