A Pennsylvania "executive coach" is offering hopeless email addicts a 12-step detox programme "designed to tackle their obsession", Reuters reports. Marsha Egan, who claims email "abuse" can cost US business millions in lost productivity, cites the chilling cases of "a golfer who checked his BlackBerry after every shot" and a …
phsssh that ain't noth'n
Limiting myself to one flavour of Linux, FC, OpenBSD, Solaris and a few necessary software mailing lists like Octave, add in odds and sods and personal stuff and I routinely run over 300 emails every day. No problem really. I can't see how 60 emails a day can be seen as onerous unless they're contracts running into many pages. I think the 12 step acolytes might be better served taking management and remedial reading lessons. just my loose change.
Hm... well at least I know about a cousin of mine that reads all of his emails ... including those pesky forwards with jokes, bad jokes, pr0n pics et. al.
I stopped reading all of those altogether when I started getting 10 or more of those daily, they were eating up my time... and I prefer to do something else with my time.
I used to have 200+ unread emails in my inbox before I took this approach ... currently I have no more than 10, and of those usually it is only 1 or 2 that really matter.
Oh, and that's weekly.
(Of course, my work email does get much more than that, but that's another story.)
Email Is Asynchronous
I don't understand where the problem is. Email is supposed to be completely asynchronous - you check it as often or as rarely as you like, without noticing delays (mostly) for the transfers. The longer you leave it, the more there'll be later. The inspired would use filters to help them manage large amounts of mail but this is only a disguise because you still have to check it in the end and it's a question of prioritisation. The uberkewl will implement his own push notification as by procmail/maildrop to chime a bell when new mail falls into the inbox as a hint that you might want to check mail now, and use email clients that actually follow standards to sort by threads.
Sixty mails a day? Ha! I'll have those if you'll manage my 350-400+/day spams, 300+/day listmail (including RSS feeds converted to mail messages)) and 30-40 new mails not counting uncaught spam and regular mailouts, thank you very much. And I'll take email over a phone call, any day. If you want to talk to me you can bloody well arrange it by email first. I HATE telephones! Just think of emails like letters, write formerly and nicely, and no txt spk pls.
It may be true that I sometimes feel anxious if I don't tend to my listmail too often, as I always like to catch up before the volume beckons me to blast the mail, but by and large I'm a happy email lover. I have always been. And I've never felt so compelled to check my mail as to give up other, often more enjoyable pursuits. You've just got to manage and pace yourself and use the tools available.
PS: there is no such thing as an empty inbox. I am, however, in negotiations to register the trademark. :-)
I agree. 300 legit is no problem for me. I only have 6 "principle" accounts, but I'm on more than a few mailing lists.
Now spam. At least Eudora does a pretty good job of filtering that out.
- Just TWO climate committee MPs contradict IPCC: The two with SCIENCE degrees
- 14 antivirus apps found to have security problems
- Feature Scotland's BIG question: Will independence cost me my broadband?
- Apple winks at parents: C'mon, get your kid a tweaked Macbook Pro
- FTC to mobile carriers: If you could stop text scammers being jerks that'd be just great