The imminent arrival of Windows Vista is a mixed blessing for developers. The good bit is lots of new features to play with, along with better security and an updated user interface. The downside is compatibility problems, and with the challenge of meeting expectations for well-behaved, good-looking Vista applications. There is …
Lucky old world - Vista is great!
So, with tens of millions of existing Windows users poised and ready to upgrade their existing WinXP... errrmm, I mean Win2k, errmm, I mean WinNT4... systems to Windows Vista on the first day of its release to consumers (Real Soon Now), there are excellent reasons for every developer to invest weeks of their time and thousands of dollars in enrolling for all of the new certified MS learning programmes, to convert all of their existing apps and create new ones (because no-one wants the long delays on getting this code out to hurt the Microsoft money-printing monopoly).
Honest. Millions and millions of eager Windows users (and corporate sysadmins).
And they won't wait for Service Pack 1. Nope.
Oops... they don't let me have sharp objects - hand me another crayon, this one's gone blunt...
There will be early adopters
> Honest. Millions and millions of eager Windows users
> (and corporate sysadmins).
Fair point, but new PCs will come bundled with Vista soon after its launch which means there will be home users and SME users among the early adopters. It is worth paying attention.
Vista looks a mess
Vista seems like it will have brain-dead security, which gets in your way, causes confusion, blocks rightful use of media, breaks application and blocks proper security software. Microsoft seem clueless about proper security (e.g. the critical need for egress filtering). If people have to turn off the extra Vista security, or hack around it to get work done and have proper security, then the extra Vista security is worthless!
As for .Net, you limit yourself and your software to the increasingly expensive windows platform (I doubt Mono ports will be viable), when many Enterprise applications run much better on cheaper/faster Linux, (Open-)Solaris and other OS platforms. All my own and work projects use Java and work fine on many systems, I don't see enough benefit in the .Net features to justify the lock-in, so regard .Net as irrelevant. If some Vista tech proved useful, I bet it would not be long before it gets ported to XP and Java, given that some Java GUI libraries and Windows shell extensions already emulate some Windows Vista features.
I currently use a locked down XP Pro and apart from a few glitches I very rarely see any security issues, given that Mozilla software, my firewall router, third party firewall software and use of restricted acounts protect me against the kiddies and criminals.
IE7 looks like little too late, Firefox and Thunderbird already have very good RSS support (as standard in Thuderbird) and are not standing still (the extensions scene is quite active), so it is doubtful that IE7 will ever catchup.
In summary, I think Vista will pan for most XP users, given that it does not offer enough improvement and has many downsides, like more usage restrictions and the requirement for a much more powerful computer, to be usable.
- Does Apple's iOS 7 make you physically SICK? Try swallowing version 7.1
- Fee fie Firefox: Mozilla's lawyers probe Dell over browser install charge
- Pics Indestructible Death Stars blow up planets with glowing KILL RAY
- Video Snowden: You can't trust SPOOKS with your DATA
- Hands on Satisfy my scroll: El Reg gets claws on Windows 8.1 spring update